conferences.computer.science

All conferences / VMCAI

VMCAI

International Conference on Verification, Model Checking, and Abstract Interpretation

Editions listed13 Covered2015–2027 Rank nowCORE B ProceedingsPaywalled Chairs & speakers2 of 8 women, 2 expected

Editions

YearEd.HeldWhere Paper deadlineAcceptedRate
2027 28 11โ€“12 Jan 2027 Mexico City ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ 30 Sep +15 days — —
2026 27 12โ€“13 Jan 2026 Rennes, Bretagne ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท 15 Sep +5 days 18 / 54 33%
2025 26 20โ€“21 Jan 2025 Denver ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ 1 Oct +22 days 20 / 48 42%
2024 25 15โ€“16 Jan 2024 London ๐Ÿด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ 31 Aug 30 / 74 41%
2023 24 15โ€“17 Jan 2023 Boston ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ 8 Sep 17 / 34 50%
2022 23 16โ€“18 Jan 2022 Philadelphia ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ 2 Sep — —
2021 22 17โ€“19 Jan 2021 Online 11 Oct +6 days — —
2020 21 19โ€“21 Jan 2020 New Orleans ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ 6 Oct +5 days — —
2019 20 13โ€“15 Jan 2019 Lisbon ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡น 14 Oct +10 days — —
2018 19 7โ€“9 Jan 2018 Los Angeles ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ 8 Oct +2 days 24 / 43 56%
2017 18 15โ€“17 Jan 2017 Paris ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท 28 Sep +7 days 27 / 60 45%
2016 17 17โ€“19 Jan 2016 St. Petersburg ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ 11 Sep 24 / 67 36%
2015 16 12โ€“14 Jan 2015 Mumbai ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ 12 Sep 24 / 53 45%

A missing year does not mean the conference did not meet: coverage before 2015 has not been verified.

Acceptance rate over time

0%30%60%
  1. 2026 33% 18/54
  2. 2025 42% 20/48
  3. 2024 41% 30/74
  4. 2023 50% 17/34
  5. 2018 56% 24/43
  6. 2017 45% 27/60
  7. 2016 36% 24/67
  8. 2015 45% 24/53

Scale runs to 60%; the mid-line marks 30%. No figure published for 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2027.

Submissions

  1. 2026 54
  2. 2025 48
  3. 2024 74
  4. 2023 34
  5. 2018 43
  6. 2017 60
  7. 2016 67
  8. 2015 53

Scaled to this conference's own busiest year (74), so the shape is comparable across its editions but not between conferences.

Who led each edition

Chairs and invited speakers

  1. all 2 25% of 8
  2. 2027 1 of 2
  3. 2026 1 of 6

Across 2 editions, 2 of 8 chairs and invited speakers were women or of another gender — 25%. At this site's own rate of 29%, 2 would be the expectation. The gap is within what chance would produce at these numbers.

Only editions with counted people appear: an edition recorded as mixed and nothing more has no arithmetic behind it, and 1 of them is left out on that ground. The total counts people, not years, so an edition with eight chairs weighs more than one with two. The committee is reported beside the platform, never added to it. The rate this is set against, 29%, is pooled from 362 chairs and invited speakers across 81 editions on this site — an observation about the field as recorded here, not a target.

How it has reviewed and published

Practice 15161718192021222324252627
Proceedings • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Anonymity                     S S D
Artifact evaluation                 •   • • •

A blank cell means nobody has checked that year, not that the answer is no. Licences are read as recorded on the edition, never inherited from the publisher.

Spotted something wrong on this page? Tell us, with a source if you have one ↗

Data entirely hand-typed, one call for papers at a time. There is no scraper behind any of this: I read the call for papers and/or the Web sites and type the dates in, in the gaps between other work, and with the hope it is useful to others. Organisers might then move deadlines without telling anyone, which may lead to inconsistencies. So, treat this small page as a well-meaning notebook rather than an authority ๐Ÿค“