VALUETOOLS

EAI International Conference on Performance Evaluation Methodologies and Tools

Editions listed9 Covered2015–2026 Rank nowCORE absent ProceedingsPaywalled Chairs & speakers3 of 8 women, 2 expected

Editions

Year	Ed.	Held	Where	Paper deadline	Accepted	Rate
2026	19	10–11 Dec 2026	Gran Canaria 🇪🇸	10 Sep firm	—	—
2025	18	11–12 Dec 2025	Glasgow 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿	17 Sep +33 days	18 / 46	39%
2024	17	12–13 Dec 2024	Milan 🇮🇹	15 Sep	18 / 29	62%
2023	16	6–8 Sep 2023	Crete 🇬🇷	21 Jun	11 / 27	41%
2021, 2022 — not recorded here, which does not mean the conference did not meet
2020	13	18–20 May 2020	Tsukuba 🇯🇵	29 Nov	—	—
2019	12	13–15 Mar 2019	Palma de Mallorca 🇪🇸	28 Oct +23 days	—	—
2017	11	5–7 Dec 2017	Taormina 🇮🇹	31 Jul +14 days	—	—
2016	10	26–28 Oct 2016	Taormina 🇮🇹	22 Jul +28 days	—	—
2015	9	14–16 Dec 2015	Berlin 🇩🇪	14 Sep	—	—

A missing year does not mean the conference did not meet: coverage before 2015 has not been verified.

Acceptance rate over time

0%30%60%

2025 39% 18/46
2024 62% 18/29
2023 41% 11/27

Scale runs to 60%; the mid-line marks 30%. No figure published for 2015, 2016, 2017, 2019, 2020, 2026.

Submissions

2025 46
2024 29
2023 27 summed

Scaled to this conference's own busiest year (46), so the shape is comparable across its editions but not between conferences.

Who led each edition

Chairs and invited speakers

all 3 38% of 8
2026 0 of 2
2025 2 of 3
2024 1 of 3

Across 3 editions, 3 of 8 chairs and invited speakers were women or of another gender — 38%. At this site's own rate of 29%, 2 would be the expectation.

Only editions with counted people appear: an edition recorded as mixed and nothing more has no arithmetic behind it. The total counts people, not years, so an edition with eight chairs weighs more than one with two. The committee is reported beside the platform, never added to it. The rate this is set against, 29%, is pooled from 362 chairs and invited speakers across 81 editions on this site — an observation about the field as recorded here, not a target.

How it has reviewed and published

Practice	15	16	17	19	20	23	24	25	26
Proceedings	•	•	•	•	•	•	•	•	•
Anonymity								S	S

Practice

Proceedings

•

Anonymity

A blank cell means nobody has checked that year, not that the answer is no. Licences are read as recorded on the edition, never inherited from the publisher.

Where it has met

Loads tiles from OpenStreetMap, which will see your IP address.

8 cities. 20152026

8 cities, 6 countries, 2 continents.

CORE rank over time

absent 2015–

Only the current rank is recorded; earlier rounds have not been checked.

Timing

Closes: anywhere between 21 Jun and 29 Nov, over the last 6 editions.
Decision: 32 days after the deadline (17–70 over 9 editions)
Then: 61 days to the conference (37–101)

No call is open. If it runs again and keeps to its habits, expect the next one to close somewhere in that range — but that is this page reading a pattern, not an announcement.

Deadline habits

Extended: 4 of 5 editions (1 confirmed firm)
Typical: 14–33 days
Longest: 33 days
Not known: 4 editions

An edition counts as firm only when it was checked; a deadline with no earlier date recorded is counted as not known, not as firm.

Elsewhere

DBLP: valuetools ↗
Calendar: Subscribe to VALUETOOLS
Data: All editions as JSON

Notes carried over

No edition in 2018.

Kept verbatim from the old site while it is being turned into structured data.

Spotted something wrong on this page? Tell us, with a source if you have one ↗

Data entirely hand-typed, one call for papers at a time. There is no scraper behind any of this: I read the call for papers and/or the Web sites and type the dates in, in the gaps between other work, and with the hope it is useful to others. Organisers might then move deadlines without telling anyone, which may lead to inconsistencies. So, treat this small page as a well-meaning notebook rather than an authority 🤓