NSV

International Workshop on Numerical Software Verification

Editions listed6 Covered2017–2022 Rank nowCORE absent ProceedingsPaywalled

Editions

Year	Ed.	Held	Where	Paper deadline	Accepted	Rate
2022	15	11 Aug 2022	Haifa 🇮🇱	31 May +21 days	—	—
2021	—		—	—	3 / 3	100%
2020	13	19 Jul 2020	Los Angeles 🇺🇸	20 Apr	—	57%
2019	12	13–14 Jul 2019	New York City 🇺🇸	24 Apr	—	—
2018	11	19 Jul 2018	Oxford 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿	11 May +26 days	—	—
2017	10	22–23 Jul 2017	Heidelberg 🇩🇪	1 May +9 days	—	—

A missing year does not mean the conference did not meet: coverage before 2017 has not been verified.

Acceptance rate over time

0%30%60%

2021 100% 3/3
2020 57%

Scale runs to 60%; the mid-line marks 30%. No figure published for 2017, 2018, 2019, 2022.

How it has reviewed and published

Practice	17	18	19	20	22
Proceedings	•	•	•	•	•

Practice

Proceedings

•

A blank cell means nobody has checked that year, not that the answer is no. Licences are read as recorded on the edition, never inherited from the publisher.

Where it has met

Loads tiles from OpenStreetMap, which will see your IP address.

5 cities. 20172022

5 cities, 4 countries, 3 continents.

CORE rank over time

absent 2017–

Only the current rank is recorded; earlier rounds have not been checked.

Timing

Closes: between 21 Apr and 31 May, over the last 5 editions.
Decision: 19 days after the deadline (4–33 over 5 editions)
Then: 57 days to the conference (52–65)

No call is open. If it runs again and keeps to its habits, expect the next one to close in the same window — but that is this page reading a pattern, not an announcement.

Deadline habits

Extended: 3 of 3 editions
Typical: 9–26 days
Longest: 26 days
Not known: 2 editions

An edition counts as firm only when it was checked; a deadline with no earlier date recorded is counted as not known, not as firm.

Elsewhere

DBLP: nsv ↗
Data: All editions as JSON

Notes carried over

Acceptance: 57% in 2020 (4/7), 100% (3/3) in 2021

Extensions: 9 days (2017), 26 days (2018), 14 days (2022)

Kept verbatim from the old site while it is being turned into structured data.

Spotted something wrong on this page? Tell us, with a source if you have one ↗

Data entirely hand-typed, one call for papers at a time. There is no scraper behind any of this: I read the call for papers and/or the Web sites and type the dates in, in the gaps between other work, and with the hope it is useful to others. Organisers might then move deadlines without telling anyone, which may lead to inconsistencies. So, treat this small page as a well-meaning notebook rather than an authority 🤓