conferences.computer.science

All conferences / ICFEM

ICFEM

International Conference on Formal Engineering Methods

Editions listed15 Covered2009–2026 Rank nowCORE C ProceedingsPaywalled Chairs & speakers3 of 14 women, 4 expected

Editions

YearEd.HeldWhere Paper deadlineAcceptedRate
2026 27 17โ€“20 Nov 2026 Southampton ๐Ÿด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ 22 Jun +14 days 22 / 63 35%
2025 26 10โ€“13 Nov 2025 Hangzhou ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ 15 Jun +14 days 20 / 47 43%
2024 25 2โ€“6 Dec 2024 Hiroshima ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต 8 Jul +14 days 22 / 50 44%
2023 24 22โ€“24 Nov 2023 Brisbane ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ 28 May +7 days 13 / 34 38%
2022 23 24โ€“27 Oct 2022 Madrid ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ 7 May +20 days 23 / 61 38%
2020 22 2โ€“6 Nov 2020 Singapore ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฌ 17 May +16 days — —
2019 21 5โ€“9 Nov 2019 Shenzhen ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ 18 Jun +28 days — —
2018 20 12โ€“16 Nov 2018 Gold Coast ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ 21 May +7 days 22 / 66 33%
2017 19 13โ€“17 Nov 2017 Xiโ€™An ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ 14 May +7 days 28 / 80 35%
2016 18 14โ€“18 Nov 2016 Tลkyล ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต 7 May +7 days 27 / 64 42%
2015 17 3โ€“6 Nov 2015 Paris ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท 3 May 27 / 82 33%
2014 16 3โ€“7 Nov 2014 Luxembourg ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡บ 2 May — 30%
2013 — not recorded here, which does not mean the conference did not meet
2012 — — — — 36%
2011 — — — 31 / 103 30%
2010 — not recorded here, which does not mean the conference did not meet
2009 — — — 36 / 121 30%

A missing year does not mean the conference did not meet: coverage before 2009 has not been verified.

Acceptance rate over time

0%30%60%
  1. 2026 35% 22/63
  2. 2025 43% 20/47
  3. 2024 44% 22/50
  4. 2023 38% 13/34
  5. 2022 38% 23/61
  6. 2018 33% 22/66
  7. 2017 35% 28/80
  8. 2016 42% 27/64
  9. 2015 33% 27/82
  10. 2014 30%
  11. 2012 36%
  12. 2011 30% 31/103
  13. 2009 30% 36/121

Scale runs to 60%; the mid-line marks 30%. No figure published for 2019, 2020.

Submissions

  1. 2026 63
  2. 2025 47
  3. 2024 50
  4. 2023 34
  5. 2022 61
  6. 2018 66
  7. 2017 80
  8. 2016 64
  9. 2015 82
  10. 2011 103
  11. 2009 121

Scaled to this conference's own busiest year (121), so the shape is comparable across its editions but not between conferences.

Who led each edition

Chairs and invited speakers

  1. all 2 21% of 14
  2. 2026 2 of 7
  3. 2025 1 of 7

Across 2 editions, 3 of 14 chairs and invited speakers were women or of another gender — 21%. At this site's own rate of 29%, 4 would be the expectation. The gap is within what chance would produce at these numbers.

Only editions with counted people appear: an edition recorded as mixed and nothing more has no arithmetic behind it. The total counts people, not years, so an edition with eight chairs weighs more than one with two. The committee is reported beside the platform, never added to it. The rate this is set against, 29%, is pooled from 362 chairs and invited speakers across 81 editions on this site — an observation about the field as recorded here, not a target.

How it has reviewed and published

Practice 141516171819202223242526
Proceedings • • • • • • • • • • • •

A blank cell means nobody has checked that year, not that the answer is no. Licences are read as recorded on the edition, never inherited from the publisher.

Spotted something wrong on this page? Tell us, with a source if you have one ↗

Data entirely hand-typed, one call for papers at a time. There is no scraper behind any of this: I read the call for papers and/or the Web sites and type the dates in, in the gaps between other work, and with the hope it is useful to others. Organisers might then move deadlines without telling anyone, which may lead to inconsistencies. So, treat this small page as a well-meaning notebook rather than an authority ๐Ÿค“