conferences.computer.science

All conferences / FEVER / 2017

FEVER 2017

Workshop on Formal approaches to Explainable VERification

Held23 Jul 2017 WhereHeidelberg 🇩🇪 RankCORE absent Website fever.nilsjansen.org ↗
Closed

Submission closed on 29 May 2017, after an extension of 7 days.

Submission timeline

  • 29 May 2017 Full paper 22 May 2017 → 29 May 2017 +7 days
  • 30 May 2017 Notification
  • 23 Jul 2017 Conference opens

What to submit

Format
2 pages LNCS
Proceedings
No proceedings

Papers can be ongoing or already accepted elsewhere.

Call for papers

The call, as published

Reproduced verbatim from the organisers’ announcement. The conference’s own page is at fever.nilsjansen.org.

The FEVER workshop solicits presentations of ongoing or previously published work to enable discussions on a broad range of topics. These presentations will not be subject to proceedings publication. 

====================================================================
             Call for informal presentations (abstracts)

                          FEVER 2017

Workshop on Formal approaches to Explainable VERification
JULY 23, 2017, HEIDELBERG, GERMANY

Co-Located with CAV 2017

http://fever.nilsjansen.org

====================================================================

This workshop will focus on the problem of rendering the results of formal verificaton more understandable to humans, and on the inherent problem of requiring explanations for the results of formal verification.
As we are also interested in formal measures to explainability, this is the problem of 'Formal approaches to Explainable VERification’ (FEVER).

Traditionally, formal verification aims to provide guarantees on the behavior of a system model. We believe, however, that the FEVER problem is not sufficiently addressed by state-of-the-art techniques.
We see FEVER as a significant new research opportunity for the Computer-Aided Verification community. 
The traditional modeling and verification processes suffer from their inherent complexity, which makes it hard for non-specialists to understand and rely on them. 
Formal measures of explainability will contribute to establishing  trust in such methods.

The workshop seeks to bring together researchers with diverse expertises, including CAV, AI, VR (Virtual Reality), and HCI (Human-Computer Interaction), to lay down the foundations for this new topic and to discuss existing approaches, ideas, and challenges.

Topics include, but are not limited to:

+  understandable modeling languages, such as probabilistic programs
+  accessible synthesis results and abstraction techniques
+  explainable counterexamples and controllers

As there are no formal proceedings for the workshop, the main focus is on a broad range of topics that trigger lively discussions.


==================
INVITED SPEAKERS 
==================
* Roderick Bloem, TU Graz, Austria
* Holger Hermanns, Saarland University, Germany


==================
IMPORTANT DATES
==================
Abstract submission: May 22, 2017
Notification: May 30, 2017
Workshop: July 23, 2017


==================
 SUBMISSIONS 
==================
We encourage all interested authors to submit an abstract of their presentation through Easychair 

https://easychair.org/conferences/?conf=fever2017

We particularly invite work recently accepted to top conferences and ongoing work.
The submission should be a pdf of at most two pages in the llncs style.
Accepted presentations will not be subject to proceedings publication. 


==================
 PC CHAIRS
==================
* Benoît Delahaye, University of Nantes, France
* Nils Jansen, The University of Texas at Austin, USA
* Scott A. Smolka, Stony Brook University, USA
* Ufuk Topcu, The University of Texas at Austin, USA

Data entirely hand-typed, one call for papers at a time. There is no scraper behind any of this: I read the announcement and type the dates in, in the gaps between other work, and with the hope it is useful to others. Organisers then move deadlines without telling anyone, calls get edited in place, and now and then the typing is simply wrong. Treat this as a well-meaning notebook rather than an authority, and check the conference’s own page before you submit anything you care about.