--------------- CALL FOR PAPERS --------------- We invite high-quality submissions, from both industry and academia, describing original and unpublished results of theoretical, empirical, conceptual, and experimental software engineering research. Contributions should describe innovative and significant original research. Papers describing groundbreaking approaches to emerging problems are also welcome, as well as replication papers. Submissions that facilitate reproducibility by using available datasets or making the described tools and datasets publicly available are especially encouraged. For a list of specific topics of interest, please see the end of this call. Note #1: The Proceedings of the ACM on Software Engineering (PACMSE) Issue FSE 2025 seeks contributions through submissions in this track. Accepted papers will be invited for presentation at FSE 2025. Approval has been granted by ACM in July 2023. PACMSE will be the only proceedings where accepted research track papers will be published. Please check the FAQ for details. Note #2: The steering committee has decided that starting from 2024 the conference name will be changed to ACM International Conference on the Foundations of Software Engineering (FSE). Note #3: Based on the coordination among FSE, ICSE, and ASE steering committees, the FSE conference and submission dates have been moved earlier, similarly to FSE 2024 deadlines. The intention is for this schedule to remain stable in the years ahead and the conference and submission deadlines of the three large general software engineering conferences to be spread out throughout the year. Note #4: Submissions must follow the “ACM Policy on Authorship ” released April 20, 2023, which contains policy regarding the use of Generative AI tools and technologies, such as ChatGPT. Please also check the ACM FAQ which describes in what situations generative AI tools can be used (with or without acknowledgement). Note #5: The names and list of authors as well as the title in the camera-ready version cannot be modified from the ones in the submitted version unless there is explicit approval from the track chairs. Note #6: Submissions that are changing the required submission format to gain additional space will be desk rejected. Examples of changing format include removing the ACM Reference format and the permission to make digital or hard copy footnotes on the first page. # TRACKS --------------- This CFP refers to the Research Track of FSE 2025. For the remaining tracks, please check the specific calls on the website: https://conf.researchr.org/home/fse-2025 # HOW TO SUBMIT --------------- At the time of submission, each paper should have no more than 18 pages for all text and figures, plus 4 pages for references, using the following templates: Latex or Word (Mac) or Word (Windows) . Authors using LaTeX should use the sample-acmsmall-conf.tex file (found in the samples folder of the acmart package) with the acmsmall option. We also strongly encourage the use of the review, screen, and anonymous options as well. In summary, you want to use: \documentclass[acmsmall,screen,review,anonymous]{acmart}. Papers may be submitted using numeric citations, but final versions of accepted papers must use the author-year format for citations. It is a single-column page layout. Submissions that do not comply with the above instructions will be desk rejected without review. Papers must be submitted electronically through the FSE 2025 submission site: https://fse2025.hotcrp.com Each submission will be reviewed by at least three members of the program committee. The review process is that the initial output can be accept, reject or major revision. When the initial output of the three reviews is major revision, authors will have an opportunity to address the reviewers’ requests during a 6-week major revision period. Such requests may include additional experiments or new analyses of existing results; major rewriting of algorithms and explanations; clarifications, better scoping, and improved motivations. The revised submission must be accompanied by a response letter, where the authors explain how they addressed each concern expressed by the reviewers. The same reviewers who requested major revisions will then assess whether the revised submission satisfies their requests adequately. Submissions will be evaluated on the basis of originality, importance of contribution, soundness, evaluation (if relevant), quality of presentation, and appropriate comparison to related work. Some papers may have more than three reviews, as PC chairs may solicit additional reviews based on factors such as reviewer expertise and strong disagreement between reviewers. The program committee as a whole will make final decisions about which submissions to accept for publication. In addition to declaring the topics which are relevant for their submissions, authors will be asked to declare the research methods employed in their submissions. This will enable us to ensure reviewer expertise both for research methods and topics. For full definitions of the research methods, see the SIGSOFT Empirical Standards . # DOUBLE-ANONYMOUS REVIEW PROCESS --------------------------------- In order to ensure the fairness of the reviewing process, the FSE 2025 Research Papers Track will employ a double-anonymous review process, where reviewers do not know the identity of authors, and authors do not know the identity of external reviewers. The papers submitted must not reveal the authors’ identities in any way: - Authors should leave out author names and affiliations from the body of their submission. - Authors should ensure that any citation to related work by themselves is written in third person, that is, “the prior work of XYZ” as opposed to “our prior work”. - Authors should not include URLs to author-revealing sites (tools, datasets). Authors are still encouraged to follow open science principles and submit replication packages, see more details on the open science policy below. - Authors should anonymize author-revealing company names but instead provide general characteristics of the organizations involved needed to understand the context of the paper. - Authors should ensure that paper acknowledgements do not reveal the origin of their work. - While authors have the right to upload preprints on ArXiV or similar sites, they should avoid specifying that the manuscript was submitted to FSE 2025. - During review, authors should not publicly use the submission title. The double-anonymous process used this year is “heavy”, i.e., the paper anonymity will be maintained during all reviewing and discussion periods. In case of major revision, authors must therefore maintain anonymity in their response letter and must provide no additional information that could be author-revealing. To facilitate double-anonymous reviewing, we recommend the authors to postpone publishing their submitted work on arXiv or similar sites until after the notification. If the authors have uploaded to arXiv or similar, they should avoid specifying that the manuscript was submitted to FSE 2025. Authors with further questions on double-anonymous reviewing are encouraged to contact the program chairs by email. Papers that do not comply with the double-anonymous review process will be desk-rejected. # SUBMISSION POLICIES --------------------- The authors must follow the “ACM Policy on Authorship” released April 20, 2023 and its accompanying FAQ including the following points: - “Generative AI tools and technologies, such as ChatGPT, may not be listed as authors of an ACM published Work. The use of generative AI tools and technologies to create content is permitted but must be fully disclosed in the Work. For example, the authors could include the following statement in the Acknowledgements section of the Work: ChatGPT was utilized to generate sections of this Work, including text, tables, graphs, code, data, citations, etc.). If you are uncertain about the need to disclose the use of a particular tool, err on the side of caution, and include a disclosure in the acknowledgements section of the Work.” - “If you are using generative AI software tools to edit and improve the quality of your existing text in much the same way you would use a typing assistant like Grammarly to improve spelling, grammar, punctuation, clarity, engagement or to use a basic word processing system to correct spelling or grammar, it is not necessary to disclose such usage of these tools in your Work.” Please read the full policy and FAQ. Papers submitted for consideration to FSE should not have been already published elsewhere and should not be under review or submitted for review elsewhere during the reviewing period. Specifically, authors are required to adhere to the ACM Policy and Procedures on Plagiarism and the ACM Policy on Prior Publication and Simultaneous Submissions . To prevent double submissions, the chairs might compare the submissions with related conferences that have overlapping review periods. The double submission restriction applies only to refereed journals and conferences, not to unrefereed forums (e.g. arXiv.org). To check for plagiarism issues, the chairs might use external plagiarism detection software. All publications are subject to the ACM Author Representations policy . By submitting your article to an ACM Publication, you are hereby acknowledging that you and your co-authors are subject to all ACM Publications Policies , including ACM’s new Publications Policy on Research Involving Human Participants and Subjects . Alleged violations to any of the above policies will be reported to ACM for further investigation and may result in a full retraction of your paper, in addition to other potential penalties, as per the ACM Publications Policies. Please ensure that you and your co-authors obtain an ORCID ID, so you can complete the publishing process if your paper is accepted. ACM has been involved in ORCID from the start and they have recently made a commitment to collect ORCID IDs from all published authors. ACM is committed to improve author discoverability, ensure proper attribution and contribute to ongoing community efforts around name normalization; your ORCID ID will help in these efforts. The authors of accepted papers are invited and strongly encouraged to attend the conference to present their work. Attendance at the event is not mandatory for publication. Authors also have the option of not presenting their work at the conference, in which case they do not need to register. # IMPORTANT DATES ----------------- All dates are 23:59:59 AoE (UTC-12h) - Paper registration: September 5, 2024 (to register a paper, paper title, abstract, author list, and some additional metadata are required; title and abstract must contain sufficient information for effective bidding; registrations containing empty or generic title and abstract may be dropped) - Full paper submission: September 12, 2024 - Author response: November 22-26, 2024 - Initial notification: January 14, 2024 (long discussion period due to year-end holidays) - Revised manuscript submissions (major revisions only): February 25, 2025 - Final notification for major revisions: April 1, 2025 - Camera ready: April 24, 2025 The official publication date is the date the journal issue is made available in the ACM Digital Library. This date may be as early as July 1, 2025. The official publication date affects the deadline for any patent filings related to published work. Please also note that the names and list of authors as well as the title in the camera-ready version cannot be modified from the ones in the submitted version unless there is explicit approval from the track chairs. # OPEN SCIENCE POLICY --------------------- The research track of FSE has introduced an open science policy. Openness in science is key to fostering scientific progress via transparency, reproducibility, and replicability. The steering principle is that all research results should be accessible to the public, if possible, and that empirical studies should be reproducible. In particular, we actively support the adoption of open data and open source principles and encourage all contributing authors to disclose (anonymized and curated) data to increase reproducibility and replicability. Upon submission to the research track, authors are asked to make a replication package available to the program committee (via upload of supplemental material or a link to a private or public repository) or to comment on why this is not possible or desirable. Furthermore, authors are asked to indicate whether they intend to make their data publicly available upon acceptance. We ask authors to provide a supporting statement on the availability of a replication package (or lack thereof) in their submitted papers in a section named Data Availability after the Conclusion section. Be careful that such statements continue to maintain author anonymity. For more details, see the FSE open science policy . Authors of accepted papers will be given an opportunity (and encouragement) to submit their data and tools to the separate FSE’25 artifact evaluation committee. # TOPICS OF INTEREST -------------------- Topics of interest include, but are not limited to: - Artificial intelligence and machine learning for software engineering - Autonomic computing - Debugging and fault localization - Dependability, safety, and reliability - Distributed and collaborative software engineering - Embedded software, safety-critical systems, and cyber-physical systems - Empirical software engineering - Human and social aspects of software engineering - Human-computer interaction - Mining software repositories - Mobile development - Model checking - Model-driven engineering - Parallel, distributed, and concurrent systems - Performance engineering - Program analysis - Program comprehension - Program repair - Program synthesis - Programming languages - Recommendation systems - Requirements engineering - Search-based software engineering - Services, components, and cloud - Software architectures - Software engineering education - Software engineering for machine learning and artificial intelligence - Software evolution - Software processes - Software security - Software testing - Software traceability - Symbolic execution - Tools and environments -- *Dr. Kla Tantithamthavorn* Senior Lecturer in Software Engineering Course Director for the Bachelor Degree of Software Engineering (Honours) Program Director of Responsible AI Software Engineering (RAISE) *Monash University* *Faculty of Information and Technology* Room 217, 20 Exhibition Walk Clayton VIC 3800 Australia E: chakkrit@monash.edu W: http://chakkrit.com CRICOS Provider 00008C/01857J We acknowledge and pay respects to the Elders and Traditional Owners of the land on which our four Australian campuses stand. Information for Indigenous Australians We're committed to diversity and inclusion